Sunday, December 23, 2018

Restoring the Dignity & Honour of IRS Officer to exit gracefully from service as a Civil Servant


Date: 02.12.2018
Place: Bangalore
To,
Shri K V Chowdary, IRS
The Chief Vigilance Commissioner
New Delhi,


Respected Sir,

Sub: Restoring the Dignity & Honour of IRS Officer to exit gracefully from service as a Civil Servant -Reg.
Ref: CVC OM No. 015/ITX/011/301272 dated 03.12.2015
Ref: My letters dated 26.11.2018, 28.11.2018 & 01.12.2018


When I walked into Unit-II (Investigation), Bangalore in the year 2001, met you in chamber for a search action, I saw in you a towering personality & a legend in IRS. I took you immediately as my role model without any hitch. This was an earnest feeling of a probationer, with bubbling enthusiasm, who joined fresh from NADT in field after passing out, as an outstanding officer, in the year 2001.

Furthermore, it’s a feather in the cap for IRS fraternity, that you are the first non-IAS civil servant to occupy this prestigious post. The place where you have reached, would have been distant dream if you were an innocent officer, trapped like me and led a life for a decade with a “vigilance tag.”

This is an introduction to an officer from IRS, who appeared for more than fifty search actions in the first year of joining the field, in addition to substantive charge, later participated in more than two hundred search actions before the year 2005. I feel proud and contended that in my times, I too was one of the most humble, affable, celebrated, unblemished outstanding IRS officer. And today I am dragged and being beaten down by authorities from top to bottom, who not only lack a human heart but have repeatedly failed in discharging their official & fundamental duties.

Sir, though I knew you personally and shared a good relationship, I had never approached you for any help or a personal favour, even when you were the Member CBDT. I have also never met Shri S M Nigam, the then DGIT(Vig)/CVO for help or any favour, who was instead our course director while probation with whom I had a very good relationship with him too. Why? Because I firmly believed that I have done no wrong, and never felt I need a favour from any of my known acquaintances. Instead, I had complete faith in the institutional mechanism led by CBDT, which will give me a fair chance to prove my innocence. But over a decade of experience I can say that CBDT and its vigilance mechanism have failed, not only with inordinate delays but also lacks muscle to nail the guilty. Instead, it knows how to punish an innocent which is quite contrary to its fundamental duty.

The above exercise is being done so as to make you aware, how I was harassed and victimised under CBDT administration for more than a decade. It definitely made an innocent & hardworking outstanding officer to get disillusioned from Indian Revenue Service, and go on an unauthorised leave for more than six years, in three spells, and then search for a new professional life at the age 42.

                          

                       

                       

The above photos are the evidence of my life as an innovator where I became the one and only civil servant in entire bureaucracy to win GOLD Medal from the Department of Science and Technology-Lockheed Martin’ India Innovation Growth Programme - GOLD Medal (2015), National and Global Winner in UNIDO-MSME-GEF Global Cleantech Innovation Programme – 2015. I have won several other medals including international acclaim for innovation in Energy Efficient Gas Fuel Burner System. Today, I am one of the leading thermodynamics gas fuel scientists on radiant heat. The present gas fuel burner system has a thermal efficiency under IS 14612 between 36-45%, whereas my innovation has created a new world record by raising it between 65-68.9%.

The above photos are very important not because of my personal achievement but for the below reasons:
·       It has happened during the period of victimisation where I did not have any option but to go on unauthorised leave after being disillusioned from IRS and start life from scratch at the age of 42.
·       The achievement is not only important because I am the one and only CIVIL SERVANT, to achieve this feat in bureaucratic history in India till date, but it is even more important because I am a commerce student and not an engineer, who is reversing the gas fuel mechanism and creating standards in Radiant Heat mechanism across gas fuel for BIS, which the world can follow.
·       You may also note that when I could achieve this feat in my most horrifying condition in a totally unknown terrain, then imagine where I could have taken my career in Income-tax Department if I had its support.
·       After starting life afresh, I gave up all the benefit of reservation as Scheduled Caste not only for me but for my entire family and entered the competitive world of innovation as a common man.
·       Sir, you may find difficulty in recognising my photo with Hon’ble PM, S&T Minister and the India UN Head as I am not a complete fit man as I used to be. I had touched the weight of 136 Kg and now I am slowly coming down. I am now convinced that weight is just the external manifestation of what one is carrying in one’s own mind.

Sir, I am approaching you from the following position to restore my dignity and honour as an IRS officer, who is desperately waiting to leave the service gracefully and contribute to the field of science on radiant heat through gas fuel and bring laurels to India :-
·       Leader of the CVC
·       Erstwhile member of CBDT
·       IRS Service camaraderie
·       A government servant
·       A citizen of India

Sir, I request you to personally read my material, as mentioned in the subject,  so that you will be aware that the Commission was kept in dark all along by the DGIT/CVO & the real truth about my vigilance proceeding. If the commission was aware of the real truth, I am sure that even the Commission in their distant dream would not initiated major penalty in my case. The entire machinery under CBDT including the vigilance machinery acting as CVO failed in their fundamental duty in bringing out the truth before you till date. It is only when I felt that justice is not possible to get within their vigilance proceeding framework, I decided to go public as my life was already dragged to road over a decade. So, let me start from the beginning, the launch of action from your desk for having initiated major penalty against me.


The CVC initiated major penalty in my case based on the DGIT/CVO findings on underassessment. The entire case vest only on the Article of Charge-1. The allegation and truth of the case is as under:

Allegation by the DGIT/CVO: The original income of H R Ravichandra as an individual, for the assessment period 2000-01 to AY 2003-04,  was Rs. 67,75,690/-. The search assessment was done @ Rs. 49,06,370/- which led to a Revenue Loss of Rs. 18,63920. The search assessment was done in the hands of THREE partnership firm ( i) M/s Royal Shelters, ii) M/s Royal Park Residency iii) Royal Habitat.

The truth: The original income of H R Ravichandra as an individual, for the assessment period 2000-01 to AY 2003-04,  was Rs. 67,75,690/-. The search assessment was done @ Rs. 77,41,198/- which led to a Revenue Gain of Rs. 31,47,213 (Additional Tax @ Rs.6,85,462 + 234 ABC Interest @ Rs. 24,61,751). The search assessment was done in the hands of FIVE partnerships (i) M/s Royal Shelters, ii) M/s Royal Park Residency iii) Royal Habitat iv) M/s R S Constructions, and v) M/s R S Developers,

Sir, you may be in the state of shock and disbelief that “how come this simple truth was not visible to the CBDT vigilance machinery before launching a full scale action against me over a decade?”

Sir this fact the DGIT(Vig)/CVO has failed to put before you while initiating the major penalty in my case. Till date, the CVO used the entire machinery against me for more than a decade and were part of a deliberate total cover up operation. What other truths were hidden from you are as under:-

1.    A group of IRS officers spoiled my ACR 2006-07 by orchestering an “ADVERSE” rating. I got it expunged through a detailed representation bringing all kinds of bias against me despite doing excellent work.
2.    The vigilance proceedings were created by the same group of officers when they did not succeed in spoiling my ACR. I pleaded before the DGIT(Inv), Bangalore, but did not get any help to protect an innocent officer.
3.    The DGIT(Vig)/CVO sought additional time of 7 ½ years from the Commission and failed to discover truth despite having all the search assessment folders done by me.
4.    Subsequently, the DGIT(Vig)/CVO used a group of IRS officer with vested interest as prosecution witnesses and then created case against me for “initiating major penalty.” The DGIT (Vig)/CVO is also aware about the questionable integrity of some of the Prosecution Witnesses.
5.    Under the leadership of the DGIT(Vig)/CVO, the vigilance proceedings started in the year 2017. The Inquiry officer not only displayed bias during the vigilance proceedings but rejected four times the supply of defense documents to the Charged officer to prove his innocence. The rejection was against the procedure as mentioned in the Vigilance Manual for conducting the fair vigilance proceedings.
6.    The Charged officer approached the DGIT/CVO(Vig) for the change of Inquiry officer for having displayed contempt towards not only the rule based proceedings but also to the judgement of the Apex Court. The DGIT/CVO rejected both, the supply of defense document and the change in Inquiry officer, and then directed me to cooperate to complete the proceedings at the earliest.

Sir, with above set of acts of the CVO, I lost complete faith in the vigilance proceedings led by DGIT(Vig)/CVO who was failing repeatedly by discharging his fundamental duty. It is only when I realised that the DGIT(Vig)/CVO is the prime conduit in the creation of false case against me then it is impossible for him to provide justice through fair means of law. It is at this juncture, I decided never to appear before the machinery led by the DGIT/CVO.

Sir, now you can feel that, rising in ranks as a CVC for you, would not have been possible if you had led life in my skin, flesh and blood. I want you to go through my letters which speaks in detail the experience of personal humiliation I faced from senior officers, while living life with a “Vigilance Tag”. This exercise will enable you to become empathical by feeling highest degree of pain, which I and my family underwent for the past decade.

Sir, the incidents, I faced are totally unfathomable in any civilised society by learned men. But this is not a story of an uneducated group of men but the story of Indian Revenue Service Officers who were selected & appointed by none other than “The President of India” to uphold the values of Indian Constitution. There is a serious HUMAN RELATIONSHIP ISSUE in some portion of IRS system from top to bottom as it stands totally diseased and rotten. It is the right time CBDT machinery needs cleaning up.

Sir, by now you would have realised that every authority dealing with my case knew the fact from the beginning but lacked courage to accept the committing of crime. Rather than undoing the wrong, everyone was involved in covering up facts and burying me alive.

Sir, I humbly request you to deal this classic and rare case directly through a “Special Officer”. The Special Officer shall inquire into this case to find the truth through an impartial inquiry. Having been tormented for a decade by bureaucratic apathy, misuse and abuse of power, I have come before you the following expectation in the interest of equity and justice:-.

a.    Review the “initiation of major penalty” if the primary Article of Charge -1 levelled against the charged officer is found to be false.
b.    Bring the total background of this case from the year 2006-07 to know how the witch-hunting was planned and executed.
c.     Action against officers down the line by fixing the responsibility for having created a false charge.
d.    Look into the whistle blower’s letter written to The DGIT (Inv) F.No. JC-1/Range-III/2009-10 dated 30.07.2009
e.     When the Special Officer findings proves the innocence of the charged officer, then issue an apology letter to the charged officer from the DGIT(Vig)/CVO for dereliction of their responsibility for having created a false vigilance proceeding.
Furthermore, after a fair inquiry and establishing the crimes in my case, the CBDT to be directed to restore the dignity and honour of a civil servant within a specific time frame:-
1)    Apology letter from the respective administrative authorities for dereliction of their responsibility in protecting an innocent officer.
2)    Cleaning up of the ACR from the year 2006-07 till date, fixing the pay, promotions and other benefits with my batch, and then giving me opportunity to exit gracefully from the Indian Revenue Service.
I have come before you with great amount of hope & pride. I treat this as the last and only chance where me and my family can get back to life as normal Indian citizens. I will be very happy if you give me personal audience for the sake of old times by calling me at +91 7671020900.

But still I ask a simple question to you before leaving “When will this injustice stop? Will I ever get justice by CVC under your leadership”?

Thanking you.
Yours faithfully,

                                                                               Sd/-
                                                                    (Sanghi Sri Hari Rao)

CC to:-
1.    The Hon’ble Prime Minister of India, New Delhi
2.    The Hon’ble Finance Minister of India. New Delhi
3.    The Chairman, CBDT, New Delhi.
4.    The Member (Personnel & Vigilance), New Delhi
5.    The Director General Income-tax (Vigilance), New Delhi.
6.    The Additional Director-General Income-tax (Vigilance)(South), Chennai.
7.    The Principle Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore-I.
8.    The Director General Income-tax (Investigation), Bangalore,
9.    The Addl. CIT (Vigilance), Bangalore
10. The Inquiry Officer, CIT (A)-3, Bangalore
11. The Presenting Officer, the DCIT Central Circle 2(2) Bangalore.



Sunday, December 2, 2018

Harassment and victimisation of an innocent IRS Officer by the administration under your leadership from past decade


Date:01.12.2018
Place: Bangalore
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax-1,
Karnataka and Goa,
Bengaluru.

Respected Sir,

Sub: Harassment and victimisation of an innocent IRS Officer by the administration under your leadership from past decade-Reg.
Ref-1: CVC OM No. 015/ITX/011/301272 dated 03.12.2015
Ref-2: F. No C – 14011/5/2016- V&L dtd 04.03.2016
Ref-3: DGIT(V)SZ/COM/18/8dtd 05.08.2015
Ref-4: C. No 34/VIG/2015-16/Pr. CC Dated 14.03.2016
Ref-5: F.No: DGIT(V)/DP/573/4898 dated 12.11.2018.
Ref-6: C. No 34/VIG/2015-16/Pr. CC Dated 14.03.2016


Kindly refer to the above.

This is further to my letter dated 26.11.2018 & 28.11.2018 regarding the vigilance proceeding. In order to save time and also to get the complete pictures, I humbly request you to download the letters which I have already sent to you and read as part of this letter. In case you are not able to locate then it is available in the following link:

The above exercise is being done as you may not have been personally involved but your chair was the conduit for the mess in my life, where I was harassed and victimised under your administration for more than a decade which made an innocent officer to get disillusioned from Indian Revenue Service and go on unauthorised leave for more than six years and search for a new professional life at the age 42.

Sir, after going through this letter you shall be in a state of disgust and disbelief to find that your chair is the genesis for spoiling my ACR in the year 2007 and then again in the year 2017. My question is, in the cycle of time of a decade, when will you stand in protecting an innocent junior officer which is definitely your fundamental duty?

Let me share, that I do not have any interest in coming back and work as an Indian Revenue Service Officer as the administration right from the CBDT till your end have failed to act when crimes against me were committed repeatedly. I am just waiting to go out gracefully from the IRS with full dignity and honour as I am fighting the biggest battle in my life. I have realised that in Indian Revenue Service I do not need enemies from outside but direct recruit senior officers are more than sufficient and doing this job brilliantly by decimating the lives of junior officers. It is time that some officer has to stand and fight to become a role model for IRS as it is a story of a junior officer fighting against the combined might of organisation from top to bottom.

After reading every word and links associated with the letter dated 26.11.2018 & 28.11.2018 you would have vividly got the complete picture. The purpose of the letter is being written to you are expressed as under:-
1.    As you are the prime accused to create this fiasco, I am providing you opportunity to correct the wrongs committed against me. By doing this you will discharge at least your fundamental duty as an administrative head. I demand you to prepare a detailed report to relevant authorities based on an inquiry and investigation by appointing an impeccable officer to do this job. If this is not done now then I shall ensure that it is definitely done later by making you a conduit in neglecting your fundamental duty despite a detailed written request.
2.    It is also your fundamental duty as the administrative head to protect the dignity of an innocent officer and bring guilty to books, as the crimes were committed under your administration in the year 2007 and then repeated again in 2017. For the sake of convenience I shall be detailing in sequence how the wrong were committed under your leadership all along.
3.    I demand that dignity and honour should be given for me to exit gracefully from Indian Revenue service as I do not find any connect with the IRS due to my worst experience over a decade. I have already embarked on a journey as an innovator which defines what the purpose of life for me is, for the remaining days of this physical body.

                                

                       

                       

The above photos are the evidence of my life as an innovator where I became the one and only civil servant in entire bureaucracy to win GOLD Medal from the Department of Science and Technology-Lockheed Martin’ India Innovation Growth Programme - GOLD Medal (2015), National and Global Winner in UNIDO-MSME-GEF Global Cleantech Innovation Programme - 2015 and several other medals including international acclaim for innovation in Energy Efficient Gas Fuel Burner System. Today, I am one of the leading thermodynamics gas fuel scientist on radiant heat. The present gas fuel burner system has a thermal efficiency under IS 14612 between 36-45%, whereas my innovation has created a new world record between 65-68.9%.

The above photos are very important not because of my personal achievement but for the below reasons:
·       It has happened during the period of victimisation under your leadership where I did not have any option but to go on unauthorised leave after being disillusioned from IRS and start life from scratch at the age of 42.
·       The achievement is not only important because I am the one and only CIVIL SERVANT, to achieve this feat in bureaucratic history in India till date, but it is even more important because I am a commerce student and not an engineer, who is reversing the gas fuel mechanism and creating standards in Radiant Heat mechanism across gas fuel for BIS, so that world can follow.
·       You may also note that when I could achieve this feat in my most horrifying condition in totally unknown terrain under your leadership then imagine where I could have taken the Income-tax Department if you had supported me by doing your fundamental duty.

I feel proud and contended that in my times, I was one of the most humble, affable, celebrated, unblemished outstanding IRS officer. And today I am dragged and being beaten by authorities like you from top to bottom, who have repeatedly failed in discharging their official & fundamental duties. Let me take you to a tour so that you can have a glimpse with serene mind and see what happened under your leadership. You will clear your tinted glass after personally experiencing how each authority committed crime on me since the year 2006-07 which is very much relevant to my current vigilance proceeding.
1.    The CCIT-1, Bangalore and the DGIT (Inv), Bangalore: The authorities have failed to take action against the erring officers who attempted spoiled the ACR of the charged innocent officer. The proceedings will clearly show how all the fundamental rules connected for the fair performance appraisal was flouted. A copy of the representation is available vide link http://sanghihari.blogspot.com/2014/12/basis-of-spoiling-my-acr-by-ak.html. This means both the authorities failed in “PROTECTING THE INNOCENT and PUNISH THE GUILTY?” The administrative ethics and morality is based on the fact that, neither writing of ACR, nor creation of vigilance proceeding, a supervising authority can display apparently or latently the aspect of witch hunting on any Government servant. On this count, both the authorities failed in hailing the edifice of “WELFARE” and being “ALERT.”  The authorities also failed to bring this crucial fact before the COMMISSION as a prelude to Vigilance proceeding against the Charged Officer.
2.    The DGIT (Inv), Bangalore:- The charged officer approached the DGIT (Inv), Bangalore for protection, as the same officer who spoiled were sinisterly orchestering the initiating of false vigilance proceeding. A copy of the letter is available vide link http://sanghihari.blogspot.com/2014/12/letter-to-br-sudhakara-pleading-not-to.html . The authority failed in his fundamental duty to protect the innocent officer and became part of the crime in creating false vigilance case against the charged officer. Is it not a gross misconduct and insanity of the DGIT(Inv), Bangalore to use again the same set of officers to create vigilance proceeding who attempted spoiling my ACR? The authority failed to protect the basic tenet of bureaucracy of rationality, impersonality and neutrality. The authority failed again to bring this important fact before the COMMISSION as a prelude to Vigilance proceeding against the Charged Officer.
3.    The DGIT(Vig)/CVO :- The story behind the main charge levelled by CVC is that a real estate entity was searched where the search proceedings revealed that income in the hands of partner (HR Ravichandra) was wrongly assessed over the number of years as the individual income instead of income assessed in the hands of partnership firm. The same mistake was corrected during search assessments as revenue gain was observed by me. So it is incumbent that the income in the hands of individual has to be adjusted against the partnership by giving refunds and then adjusting with the partnership firm. Even the statutory procedure is to give refunds in the hand of individual and adjust against the partnership as the same was requested by the assessee. So a natural practice in the Income-tax department the same was followed.

                                                                 i.     The prime allegation in Vigilance:  The prime allegation in vigilance is of under assessment. It is stated that the original income of H R Ravichandra as an individual was Rs. 67,75,690/-. The search assessment assessed by me is in the hands of three partnerships ( i) M/s Royal Shelters, ii) M/s Royal Park Residency iii) Royal Habitat, for the assessment period 2000-01 to AY 2003-04  was Rs. 49,06,370/- which led to a Revenue Loss of Rs. 18,63920.



H R Ravichandra
A.Y
Original Return
Search Assessments
2000-01
554803
554810
2001-02
791118
1966120
2002-03
1211471
2183972
2003-04
4218298
755278
Total
6775690
4906370
Search Assessment leading to a Revenue Loss of Rs. 18,63920/-

* The DGIT(Vig)/CVO even after having the file for more than 7 ½ years has done totaling mistake as the above total of search assessment in the Articles of Charge-1 comes to Rs. 54,61,180. Therefore, apparently revenue loss has came down to Rs. 13,14,150/- instead of Rs. 18,63,920/-.

                                                                ii.     The actual reality of the case is in favor of Revenue:  The net impact of assessment proceeding done by me was reducing the income in the hands of H R Ravichandra and assessing the income in the hands FIVE partnership firms  and not THREE partnership firms as alleged in the Articles of Charge-1. The details are:- ( i) M/s Royal Shelters, ii) M/s Royal Park Residency iii) M/s R S Constructions, iv) Royal Habitat, and v) M/s R S Developers for the assessment period 2000-01 to AY 2003-04 has led to enhancement of Revised income by Rs. 9,90,508 thereby bringing additional revenue of Rs. 31,47,213/- in the form of enhanced Income-tax and Interest under Section 234 B & C.

                                                              iii.     Suppression of Crucial fact by CVO to the Commission: - This fact will clearly bring out that the DGIT (Vig) has falsely framed the charge by suppressing the income assessed in the two partnership firms namely: M/s R S Constructions, and M/s R S Developers and sinisterly taking the income of only three firms (i) M/s Royal Shelters, ii) M/s Royal Park Residency iii) Royal Habitat, to create a revenue loss so that “a major penalty can be initiated despite doing an excellent work in search assessment.

H R Ravichandra
A.Y
Original Return
Search Assessments
2000-01
554803
554810
2001-02
791118
766120
2002-03
1211471
2224488
2003-04
4218298
4195780
Total
6775690
7741198
Search Assessment leading to a Revenue Gain of Rs. 9,65,508/-


Outcome of Search Assessment done by me
Description
Income Returned
Tax
Interest
Benefit to  IT Dept
Original Return Tax @ 30%
6775690
2032707

2032707
Revised Return  @ 35%
7741198
2718169
2461751
5177020
Income enhanced by
965508
685462
2461751
3147213

                                                              iv.     It should be noted that even a kindergarten child knows that total of three entity will naturally appear to be revenue loss as against the total of five entities actually having revenue gain. This becomes a classic case and rare in a vigilance proceeding of harassment and victimisation in the hand of a GATEKEEPER. The irony is that the DGIT(Vig)/CVO sought time from Commission and spent  more than 7 ½ years and still fail to discover the real truth despite having all the material in their possession. This definitely raises the credibility issue of CVO handling my case all along.

                                                               v.     Fudging the facts and doing the totalling mistake:-  Even after having the files for more than a decade the CVO failed in his fundamental duty to unearth the real truth. This fact gives me strong reason to believe that DGIT (Vig)/CVO has failed to maintain absolute integrity, devotion to duty and exhibited conduct unbecoming of a Government Servant thereby contravening the provisions of Rule 3(1)(i),  3(1)(ii), 3(1)(iii) of the CCS (Conduct) Rules,1964.

                                                              vi.     Failure to inform the crucial information to the Commission: The CVO is representing on behalf of Vigilance Commission. It was the fundamental duty of CVO to protect the innocent, to investigate and ensure that the government servant who was being charged is not part of the process of any witch hunting before the launch of the vigilance proceeding. The CVO failed to obtain this information from the DGIT(Inv) - Bangalore and CCIT-1, Bangalore as it was available at their end vide letter dated 05.11.2007 written by the charged officer. A copy of this letter is available vide link http://sanghihari.blogspot.com/2014/12/letter-to-br-sudhakara-pleading-not-to.html

4.    The character and integrity of the prosecution witness: “Holier than thou” is the basic prerequisite that authorities who levels charges on others also must have absolute character and integrity in their own backyard. Let us see the integrity levels of authorities who are the prosecution witnesses in my case. The details are as under:
a.    Shri D K Jha: - The officer integrity is already questioned by the CVO as he is already covered by CBI in the destruction of crucial evidence in the case of an assessee. The officer is also having other integrity issue in the case where I have carried out a search investigation. The officer is one of the prime conduits in spoiling my ACR.
b.    Shri Narender Kumar:- The Commission has already directed the CBDT to take action as it has found that the officer has failed in performing fundamental duty in my search assessment case by virtue of being the reporting officer. The officer is also one of the prime conduits in spoiling my ACR.
c.     Shri D K Jha, Shri Narender Kumar & Shri Ajit Korde :-  In any jurisprudence for a crime there should be two main elements, that is, ‘mens rea – the guilty mind”, and “actus rea – the guilty action.” The foolishness of all three officer emerge from the fact, that, in their rush of bureaucratic arrogance and high handedness they have not done their proper homework in creating primary Article of charge -1 as the Commission has made the basis for initiating “a major penalty proceeding” through this vigilance proceeding.  The fact is that Shri D K Jha, Shri Narender Kumar & Shri Ajit Korde does not even know that search assessment done by me is in respect of five partnership firm and not three partnership firm. There is a revenue gain and not revenue loss in the search assessments while creating false vigilance proceeding against me. So it’s clear that Shri D K Jha, Shri Narender Kumar & Shri Ajit Korde are guilty of crime in trapping, harassing and victimising and innocent officer by creating a false charge by suppressing the real facts of the case by making an innocent officer suffer for more than a decade.

5.    Unforgiving Administration at Bangalore in the year 2017: I returned from unauthorised leave in the year 2014 as I got transferred from Chennai to Bangalore and was reporting to Smt. Chandana Ramachandran, CIT-(Intl. Taxation). During this period my wife was recuperating from the post-treatment of breast cancer and my father was suffering from relapse of rectum cancer. As the work was not tough I could manage easily and took leave in order to take care of my wife and father. During the year I secured my first GOLD Medal from Department of Science and Technology for my innovation in energy efficient radiant heat gas burner, by becoming the best in the world. I had literally reversed  the gas fuel mechanism to the envy of IIT and MIT.
                                                                 i.     At the end of the year I suddenly found that I was transferred to Bangalore ITAT and the order specifically mentioned “Not to be posted to field posting” I was devastated as I did not receive a single memo from my reporting officer during the year pointing any deficiency at my work. I was disillusioned for the third time and went on unauthorised leave from the year 2015 till date. A detailed letter is available vide link https://sanghihari.blogspot.com/2018/11/unauthorised-absence-from-duty-due-to.html
                                                                ii.     On 16th October 2017 I found a sealed cover which was a letter from PCCIT-1, Bangalore intimating adverse comments on 30.05.2016 for the year 2014-15.
                                                              iii.     The letter brought to my notice that in my APAR 2014-15 at Point no.5 in Integrity Column Smt. Chandana Ramachandran, comments were “Insufficient time to judge” which was treated as adverse comment. The comments of the reporting officer are found to be frivolous as the reporting officer need not live life with me to know my integrity, but question only when there is a complaint of corruption. As I did not have any complaints questioning the integrity, then, I have all the right to be treated as innocent as the dictum for integrity is “Unless until proven Integrity for everyone is beyond doubt.”  This shows that I was again victimized on the issue of ACR by the senior officer. To my surprise the CCIT-1, Bangalore reviewing authority at Bangalore agreed with the reporting officer without ever knowing anything about me.
                                                              iv.     I sought redressal before the PCCIT-1, Karnataka & Goa. The letter is available in the link https://sanghihari.blogspot.com/2018/11/false-acr-issue-by-ms-chandana.html. This time I was not surprised when the request got rejected by the unforgiving PCCIT-1, as I had already got immune to inhuman behavior from every administrative quarter by being disillusioned. The irony is that the PCCIT who got the adverse comments from the reporting officer also delayed considerably in seeking my view for months together. I still cannot digest that how the delay at their end was considered as appropriate and fair but my inordinate delay due to no fault of mine was taken very seriously. The attitude of senior officers and the administration clearly reflects that even if you are innocent, honest and an outstanding officer, no one is going to show mercy and compassion if you have “Vigilance Tag”.
                                                               v.     I did not pursue this matter further as I knew the matter will go to insensitive line of authorities. As I was neither expecting to join back the service nor expecting rising in ranks in IRS I left the matter at that point. I was also sarcastically smiling as it is exactly after a decade my ACR was getting spoiled and there was no change in administration as “ONE CAESER WAS EXACTLY REPLACED BY ANOTHER”.
                                                              vi.     The procedure of writing ACR is so sacrosanct that a detail procedure is given cautioning the senior authorities not to be reckless while assessing the officer subordinate to them. I feel that PCCIT-1 should have personally invited Smt. Chandana Ramachandran and admonished her by stating that “your action is unconstitutional as it is against the vigilance rules prescribed for writing the ACR. There are only two option on Integrity assessment that is, DOUBTFUL and BEYOND DOUBT. Hence you writing in ACR ““Insufficient time to judge” in Integrity is totally inappropriate as it will tantamount to your misconduct” This is what an administration has to do if it is having welfare as a driving force in mind. This clearly shows that in our department is not only Smt. Chandana Ramachandran needs training while writing an ACR but many senior authorities in administration leading from top.

6.    Experience of personal humiliation from senior officers while living life with a “Vigilance Tag”:- It is really unfortunate to live life with a vigilance tag. It becomes more humiliating especially when one is totally innocent and honest on one hand and every person who meets looks down from the angle of suspicion by saying “do you know he has a vigilance case against him”. I shall be sharing several episodes with senior officers whose attitude and action literally got me disillusioned as they were completely ruthless to me at work place despite being totally committed.
a.    Mess caused in my life by administration at Bangalore in the year 2007 – First time, I went on long spell of unauthorized leave for almost two years in 2008 that is the year when I placed my resignation for the first time as Deputy Commissioner due to continued harassment by the unscrupulous officers led by Bangalore Administration, where not only my ACR was spoiled but false vigilance case was being orchestered. Both the CCIT-1 and DGIT(Inv), Karnataka and Goa, turned a blind eye on my victimisation.
b.    Depressed period of work in Madurai due to “Vigilance Tag”: I was promoted as Joint Commissioner despite the officers with sinister mind attempted to spoil my ACR and orchestered vigilance case so that my promotion will get blocked as I was in the zone of elevation. The peers and friends convinced me to join the office for the second time.  I gave an honest try by working very hard. But the senior officers made my life miserable. This led me to go on unauthorised leave, second time, for next two years in the year 2012. The incidents are :-
                                                        i.     Ruthless CIT-1, Madurai: Shri ALKB Chand, CIT-1, Madurai was my reporting officer who humiliated me in public in September 2009 despite I was putting best of efforts in the moffussil area through my hard work. The incident is available in link https://sanghihari.blogspot.com/2014/12/protest-against-alkb-chand.html.
                                                       ii.     Malicious CCIT-IV, Chennai: Shri D Ravindra, CCIT-IV Chennai was creating misinformation campaign maligning my image. The letter is available vide link https://sanghihari.blogspot.com/2014/12/protest-against-d-ravindraccit.html
                                                     iii.     Cruel Administration at Chennai: Shri P Selvaganesh a senior officer from Chennai administration was maligning the image in year 2011 especially when I was attending my father who was suffering from rectum cancer. The  letter is available vide link https://sanghihari.blogspot.com/2018/11/p-selvaganesh-objectionable-behaviour.html

Sir, by now you would have observed that the incidents, I faced are totally unfathomable in any civilised society by learned men. But this is not a story of uneducated group of men but the story of Indian Revenue Service Officers who were selected & appointed by none other than “The President of India” to uphold the values of Indian Constitution. There is serious HUMAN RELATIONSHIP ISSUE in some portion of IRS system from top to bottom as it stands totally diseased and rotten. It is the exact right time that you can become part of cleaning up process by doing “Swach Bharath Abhiyaan” in and around your surrounding as it is not only your fundamental duty but also the pet project of our honourable Prime Minister of India.

Sir, I very much aware that taking head-on the combined might I am exposing myself to a very high risk & probability of getting my new profession destroyed again by some sinister design from your end. But let me also bring to your notice the purpose why I am doing this? I had total belief that being within the institutional mechanism I will get right to be exonerated and gracefully exit from the IRS. But the way the vigilance proceedings were conducted it is only then I decided the institutional means have totally failed in CBDT and have got crippled. It is then I took up the onus in correcting it, and then attempting to revitalize the system so that after my departure, the faith of innocent junior officers will never be decided by unscrupulous senior officers.

Sir, I humbly give you a last opportunity to correct the wrongs done to me, as whatever the outcome may be, I will not appear before the inquiry officer for vigilance proceedings but fight in the Court of Law. The vigilance proceeding based on above facts is void ab-initio and the classic and rare case in the history of CBDT for its inaction, misuse and abuse of authority against an innocent IRS officer. There is no point in continuing with this proceeding as it is time to correct the wrong so that solution can be done within the aegis of CBDT. If it is not done then I still have faith in Indian Judiciary where I shall be definitely dragging every authority and making them experience my pain caused due to executive inaction through misuse and abuse of authority. I still feel we can sit across and resolve this problem amicably. As your seat is the first authority as a CREATOR of all this mess, and you are also technically still my superior, I am giving the last opportunity to solve this amicably by sitting across. Please call me as I am always available for you at +91 7671020900.

          Let me share that I will never join back the duty but definitely aspire for an honourable exit with impeccable career, so please take this request also as advance explanation if you are contemplating any memo to be issued for unauthorised absence.
         
This is for your information and necessary action.

Thanking you.
Yours faithfully,

                                                                             Sd/-
                                                                    (Sanghi Sri Hari Rao)

CC to:-
1.    The Chief Vigilance Commissioner, New Delhi.
2.    The Director General Income-tax (Vigilance), New Delhi,
3.    The Director General Income-tax (Investigation), Bangalore.
4.    The Additional Director-General Income-tax (Vigilance)(South), Chennai.
5.    The Addl. CIT (Vigilance), Bangalore.
6.       The Inquiry Officer, CIT (A)-3, Bangalore.
7.    The Presenting Officer, the DCIT Central Circle 2(2) Bangalore.