Wednesday, December 24, 2014

Protest Against D Ravindra(CCIT)

 
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
OFFICE OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE III,                                                        No. 2, V.P. Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Bibikulam, Madurai 625 002

C. No. / JCIT / Range-III / 10-11                                              Date: 28/03/2011

To

Shri D Ravindran,
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax – IV,
Chennai.


Dear Sir,

Sub : Expression of displeasure on your doubtful behavior- reg.


      On 08th March 2011 I was invited by RTI to take a session in the second half on the “Techniques of investigation”. Since I had the time in the morning I met my batch mate and a junior. After meeting the junior who had worked under me I was aghast when I knew about your in built negative bias towards me relating to the incident of Smt. KT Vijayalaxmi, ACIT, Company Circle-2, Madurai.

      Sir, I reliably learnt that you had called Shri Muthushanker, ACIT and had inquired about any problem of my relationship with Smt. KT Vijayalaxmi, ACIT. When the officer explained that there is nothing between them, then you allegedly closed the conversation by saying that “No you don’t know both had worked in Karnataka and something must have been there.”

      Before I came on training, it was also brought to my knowledge from my immediate superior that you had suspected me of backdating a draft penalty order in the case of R Bharagthwaj, approved by me on 28.05.2010, was actually signed after that date which corresponds to my long leave period. What hurt me most about the above incident was your basic attitude of suspicion without checking the matter based on facts or directly seeking an answer from me for the persistent doubt in you.

      Since you have failed to know the truth but let me bring the clarity on the entire issue. All along my career in Karnataka I worked at Bangalore was only as a DCIT. In Income-tax department an ITO does not report to DCIT. Similarly, K T Vijaylaxmi never reported to me as she was an ITO. So it becomes clear that I never had any official interaction with her. I knew K T Vijaylaxmi from a distance as I joined as a probationer in 2001 at Bangalore. While working at Bangalore I stayed in Income-tax Colony and she never stayed in the colony, therefore it leaves no room for any social relations between us. The entire period of ten years at Bangalore we both have never visited each other offices or homes can only lead to a strong belief that we do not have any reason for any grievance from each other. Whatever I have said is a fact which is verifiable by you from my service record or from administration at Bangalore. If this is the truth from my side then it is a grave insult from your side to enquire from my junior about my antecedents and precedents about my relationship with KT Vijaylaxmi and also making presumptions that we both have some problems between us or I have some reason to settle some personal scores with her. Your attitude of enquiry from a junior officer about a senior officer and then shrugging the truth and developing a negative bias is not all that fair for a person with your experience and caliber.

Shri Suryanarayana, the then CCIT told me about the posting of K T Vijaylaxmi as ACIT under the Range-III charge from Salem. The CCIT also asked me about her background when she was transferred. I replied that I hardly had any interaction at Bangalore but the officer might be good as she has risen to the position of ACIT from ranks. Shri Suryanarayana also conveyed me across that there has been instruction from the headquarters from Chennai that she should not be given any assessment or sensitive charge but is getting posted to Range-III under my jurisdiction. After K T Vijaylaxmi joined I also briefed her about a sensitive survey case relating to R Bharagthwaj where the assessment was completed by Shri Muthushankar, raising a huge demand. I also briefed that the assessing officer has already created the case for levying a penalty. Subsequently a draft order was prepared and approved on 28.05.2010. It was specifically mentioned to KT Vijaylaxmi to make the entry in the D&CR on 28.05.2010 and send the demand notice. I was about to proceed on long leave from the close of the day on 28.05.2010 as I wanted to pursue on my resignation to come out from the Indian Revenue Service for good. To make the case strong of R Bharagthwaj for subsequent years, I wrote a detailed letter to Shri G Myilanandam, Addl. CIT, Madurai about the case as the impact of the case had far reaching effect with the other office as the bogus expenditure related to M/s Viswas promoters was also discovered. To safeguard the interest, I had marked the copy to the CCIT, Madurai, CIT-I & II Madurai and also to KT Vijaylaxmi on 28.05.2010.

Sir, the above facts are verifiable and are the truth. Again if this is the truth then alleging me of backdating is a personal insult based on presumption. Doubting my integrity is not the question but doubting the entire people in chain of command is a gross injustice as the draft approval letter written by me on 28.05.2010 was in the tappal of the office of CCIT, CIT and the assessing officer. Therefore, I have my own doubts about your negative bias towards me without any rule or rhyme.

Sir, problem of KT Vijaylaxmi was not set in motion by me but was set in motion during my long leave by the then CCIT Shri Suryanarayana through several complaints received against her. Its only after my arrival from long leave it was brought to my knowledge by the then CCIT and CIT that she had dropped a penalty order of R Bharagthwaj after my approval on 28.05.2010. With this given set of facts I am developing a feeling that you are being instrumental in spreading rumors about me to make me a scapegoat so that you can save an errant assessee like R Bharagthwaj and an errant officer like K T Vijaylaxmi whose actions have been detrimental to the interest of Government of India.

      Sir, I have reliably learnt that that there are rumors that I do not have good relations with seniors, juniors, chartered accountant and public. If you are instrumental in promoting these rumors then let me boldly express that I do not have good relation with seniors who are doing excesses, I stand up very firmly against them. I never encourage meeting a chartered accountant in those cases when matter is being dealt by an assessing officer while investigation. I feel proud about it. Issuing memos to officials who can bring down the morale of organization by becoming undisciplined at work cannot be an excuse because one is an office bearer in employees union or is an active person in an employees union. The PRO is already vested with the job of meeting the general public in case of grievances and directing public to PRO for this purpose cannot be a sufficient reason to get branded that I do not have good relation with Public.

      Sir, it is surprising that you are already aware that the JCIT’s in the field have already got worked up because of extreme shortages and at these juncture if seniors like you hold negative bias without any basis then it shows the mood of seniors who are leading the organization. I know that you are aware that there is direct intervention by the senior officers from head quarters whenever a case becomes sensitive at that juncture I have hardly found any senior officers who will stand beside a JCIT and express that you please go ahead I understand your difficulty and I am with you. Rather than the supportive attitude I have found the culture of promoting rumors than easing out the difficulties at field. Your doubts of aspiration on me despite giving the best only vindicate that your attitude of presumption and negative attitude with bias is not desirable. It is not for the first time I am going through these situations.

      Sir, after you assumed office at Madurai, I was expecting that you will speak to me in detail about my requirement after I called on you. But I reliably learnt that you digged into my pending resignation status from the Vigilance and the information were sent to me that my resignation was rejected. After receiving the information I had written in detail a letter to the Chairman, CBDT on the pending status of resignation and also sought help from the office of CCIT-CCA,
Chennai and CCIT, Madurai to assist me. But till date I never received any line of communication from any authority. At this point of time when I hold charges of eight Ranges I have to deliver the best and I will do it so. But I feel uncomfortable that you never even asked anything from me on any issue but relied on rumor and half truth about me.

Sir, the most beautiful phase of an officer is when one is a DCIT. I had an active phase as DCIT till March 2008 and was always an outstanding officer. These are verifiable facts form my ACR’s. I have been victim earlier as a DCIT where efforts were made to stop my promotion and continuous harassment led me to disillusionment by leading me to place a resignation.
I was on leave for more than a year after placing the resignation. My friends and well wishers forced me to give a try as things will not be same if one becomes a Joint Commissioner. But after the brief skirmish with you and the experience of more than a year at Madurai I feel nothing has changed much. Rather than I being in the system surrounded by seniors like you for whom I have to explain, it’s better that I pursue my inner desire by coming out from the Indian Revenue Service immediately. Initially I thought to put papers afresh on 31.03.2011 but after speaking to seniors and family I have realized that the organization is short of officers and things will become better by the end of May 2011. Therefore, I have decided to put my papers afresh on 31.05.2011 from the post of Joint Commissioner.

Sir, you are appointed by the same authority who has appointed me. You are senior only by virtue of getting recruited earlier in Indian Revenue Service. I also have public office the way you have. But in my entire career I have never listened to others about a person working under me and developed bias at workplace. Irrespective of a person’s history I start my relationship at zero and feel responsible in developing them and stand along with them for any crisis. I have eased things and have dealt aberration very toughly based only on facts. While working at Madurai I have realized that the seniors want to easily believe the rumors and half truth and talk high on morality. But when the pressure on them comes from the minister in a case or otherwise then the same senior passes it to our level without standing beside a junior officer. Sir, question is not suspecting the integrity in a case which has contributed to revenue but the larger question is preventing by the senior due to pressure from top to soft peddle cases or stop investigation where influential people are involved as it stops the discovery of huge tax evasion.

Sir, let me express that I do not need a certificate from you to know who I am but I made an initiative to put the facts which were available with me so that you can use the same facts to remove aberration so that I can still share a space for smile with each other. I know my expression would have been very strong and that is why I am branded for being impolite with seniors but this is best I can give back with least hesitation as you will seldom find juniors standing before a senior. This is also why it is making my choice easy to leave an enviable job at the age of 45 from the family of Indian Revenue Service on 31.05.2011 and start life afresh so that I will be above the zone of doubting thomases.

Sir, though I never met you in my career prior to coming to Madurai, I had great respect for you because hearing nice things from my seniors and mentors like Suresh Battini and Ravi Ramachandran. I took it for certainty that you will be always above the hearsay and half truth about an individual because you are almost in the fag end of career and also you having more of characteristics of an academician. I have expressed my displeasure for your doubtful behavior on me so that I can still have the same respect for you whenever I confront you in future while at work or after leaving the organization gracefully.


      Thanking you.



                                                                       Yours faithfully,
                                                                                                       
                                                                                    Sd/-  
                                                                       (S.S. HARI RAO)
                                                            Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,
                                                                    Range – III, Madurai.


Copy to

1.    The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (CCA), Chennai

2.      The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai

No comments:

Post a Comment