F.No. TDS 18-1/07-08 Dated: 05.11.2007
Place:
Bangalore
To,
The Director General of
Income-tax (Investigation),
Karnataka and Goa ,
Sir,
Sub: Actions of Hon’ble CIT (Central) and Addl. CIT (CR-1) - Reg.
On 02.11.2007, I personally met Shri B V Subbaraya, ACIT, CC-2(1), Bangalore , around 5 PM.
The meeting was meant for the certification of copies of material for the
purpose of making representation before the Competent Authority. During my
visit and also to my sheer coincidence, I came across a call at intercom from Shri D K Jha, Addl. CIT, CR-1,
who had conversation with Shri B V Subbaraya over dispatch of assessment
folders relating to works done by me.
The call of Shri DK Jha to Shri B V Subbaraya has to be viewed keeping
the pending representation before the
Competent Authority relating to my ACR for the year 2006-07. In my
representation the basis of adverse remarks by the Hon’ble CIT (Central) was
replied in detail. The Hon’ble CIT (Central) had given the non
filling/insufficient filling of Proforma-I & II of ACR and seven cases as a
basis for making adverse remarks in my ACR. I had taken material through moment
register from the office of ACIT, CC-2(1). The matter of taking material was
also brought to the notice of Hon’ble CCIT-CCA vide letter dated 10.10.2007.
Subsequently the same was informed to your good self too. I submitted my
representation before the Competent Authority on 26.10.2007.
Sir, in my representation before the Competent Authority, I have brought
out an incident about the threatening call of Shri DK Jha, Addl. CIT, CR-1 on
my career. The matter is still pending clarification in my representation, “Whether the threatening call on my career
was the exclusive opinion of Shri DK Jha, Addl. CIT, CR-1 or was made by Shri
DK Jha, Addl. CIT, CR-1 on behalf of the Hon’ble CIT (Central)?” I have
also brought out an incident of the Hon’ble CIT (Central) displaying caste prejudices
at workplace. There were numerous incidents cited in representation, wherein,
the Hon’ble CIT (Central) had framed opinion about me by purely relying
on the version of Shri D K Jha
instead of clarifying the matter of
hearsay directly from me. This approach of Hon’ble CIT (Central) has violated
the Principle of Natural Justice.
Furthermore, the Hon’ble CIT (Central)
had not fairly assessed my work as
only my partial effort in the case was known to the Hon’ble CIT (Central), as
the assistance of Addl. CIT, CR-1 was
taken instead of the Addl. CIT,
CR-2, who was my immediate boss. I had also brought out a fact in the case
of Shri
V Srinivasa Raju, the inspection
of my case was carried out without
considering the crucial Investigation Folders and Recovery folders, which
is a serious lapse committed by the Hon’ble CIT (Central) while inspecting my
case.
Sir, my representation has also brought out in detail, that, ‘How Hon’ble CIT (Central) has violated
the Principles of Objectivity, Impartiality, Neutrality and Independence while inspecting my cases?’
Furthermore, I also narrated the sequence and events wherein it has revealed that
‘how the Hon’ble CIT (Central) and
Shri D K Jha colluded together to spoil my ACR for the year 2006-07?’
My inability to bear any further harassments and threats of the Hon’ble CIT
(Central) and Shri D K Jha at workplace, led me voluntarily to opt out of the
Central charge under the leadership of Hon’ble
CIT (Central), thinking that I will be peaceful outside their sphere of
influence. But my happiness was very short lived, not only because of my
agonies faced during the representation proceedings but also the post
representation proceedings.
Sir, I’m open to any sort of probe relating to my work by any Senior
Officer other than Shri A K Agarwal and Shri D K Jha. I’ll be happy as after
the completion of probe the decorum of any proceedings will be highlighted in
the best of manners. It has taken me more than 50 days to purely concentrate on
framing the replies based on material facts for the seven basis. I don’t intend
to spend my further energies on the mission
of fault finding process but on my work at TDS Range .
During this period my personal life has suffered and I don’t have any
regrets other than my life at workplace, as I was only concentrating about
preparing my replies even while at job. At the end, I could not only bring out
more support for my case but also the ulterior motives and half hearted
attempts of Hon’ble CIT (Central) to
frame me falsely.
Sir, my query at this stage is that “Why Shri D K Jha, Addl. CIT, CR-1 should be involved directly with the
assessing officer rather than the Office of the Hon’ble CIT (Central) in the
matters relating to the sphere of Addl. CIT, CR-2?” Sir, it may seem to
be sheer impoliteness to ask your good self this question, but I’m making the
above request only to mitigate my further victimization and mental suffering as
I had faced enough of wrath of the above Senior Officers.
In the interest of equity and justice, I request your good self that any
further move against me by the Hon’ble CIT (Central) or Shri D K Jha, Addl.
CIT, CR-1 should happen only with the knowledge of your good self. It’s my
humble prayer before your good self that a
common level playing field to be provided to an Officer under representation
vis-à-vis the Officer who has charged me and also with the Officer who has
assisted the Officer in charging me. I deeply importune you that it
would be fairer to conduct any probe relating to my work by any other Senior
Officer other than Shri A K Agarwal and
Shri D K Jha as these Officers are already deeply prejudiced against me.
If your good self seeks any clarification on this matter then it will be
an extreme pleasure for me to appear before you. I thank you for your
cooperation at all times. I request you again to do all possible and assist me
in this regard.
Thanking you.
Yours
faithfully,
Sd/-
(S S HARI
RAO)
DCIT,TDS 18(1), Bangalore
CC to:
1.
The Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore -I,
2.
The Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Bangalore .
3.
The Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax (Central Range
-1), Bangalore .
4.
The Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax (Central Range
-2), Bangalore .
5.
The Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax Central Circle -2(1), Bangalore .
No comments:
Post a Comment